Authors’ Ethics

The main responsibility of the author is to properly present the result of the study and give an objective judgment of its significance. The work should be original and not repeat previously published materials. In exceptional cases, it is permissible to publish a translation of a previously published material.

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used
the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used
the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should also cite
publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more
than one journal or primary publication. Parallel submission of the same manuscript to more than one
journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception,
design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant
contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain
substantive aspects of the research project, they should be named in an Acknowledgement section.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors (according to the above
definition) and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the author list of the manuscript, and that all
co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
All co-authors should be informed of the fact of the article being submitted by the first author, and within three months they can cancel the publication, expressing their disagreement. In cases where the articles are part of the dissertation of one of the co-authors, this should be specifically noted.

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that
might be construed to influence the results or their interpretation in the manuscript. All sources of
financial support for the project should be disclosed.

The author is fully responsible for the assessments, views and positions expressed in the presented material. The editorial board may not separate them.

If the author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in the material at the stage of its consideration or preparation for publication, he is obliged to notify the editors about them and make the necessary changes. If inaccuracies or errors are found after the publication of the material in the journal, the author must notify the editorial board about them, which is an example of a decision on the advisability of publishing supplements or refutations.

The author has the right to get acquainted with the content of the reviews and give an answer to the reviewers. Any research article undergoes a review procedure.

After making a positive decision on the proposed material, the author undertakes to participate in the preparation of his work for publication: review the first and second proofreading and make the necessary changes. Supplementing the article at this stage is unacceptable.

If you have found a spelling error, please, notify us by selecting that text and pressing Ctrl+Enter.